Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:41:13 +0200
From:      Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
Subject:   Re: Jail organization
Message-ID:  <200404261841.17705@harryhomeworkstation>
In-Reply-To: <8A17357B-978A-11D8-91B5-003065A70D30@shire.net>
References:  <87fzaravaj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <200404261342.48970.h@schmalzbauer.de> <8A17357B-978A-11D8-91B5-003065A70D30@shire.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_tuTjAmlwnSXEhIH
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Montag, 26. April 2004 16:03 schrieb Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC:
> On Apr 26, 2004, at 5:42 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Use mount_nullfs whenever you need more than the spezialized jail
> > itself was
> > designed for, eg. when installing a new port
> > mount_nullfs /hostusr/ports /jailuser/ports.
> > I explicitly use one single label for each jail. Don't forget in case
> > of a
> > compromised jail the hacker could simply fill up your filesystem when
> > you use
> > only directories.
> >
> > -Harry
>
> I have stated away from mount_nullfs because the man page for it (on
> 5-2-CURRENT) still says:
>
> BUGS
>       THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T
> WORK)
>       AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM.  USE AT
> YOUR OWN
>       RISK.  BEWARE OF DOG.  SLIPPERY WHEN WET.
>
>       This code also needs an owner in order to be less dangerous -
> serious
>       hackers can apply by sending mail to <hackers@FreeBSD.org> and
> announcing
>       their intent to take it over.
>
> HISTORY
>       The mount_nullfs utility first appeared in 4.4BSD.
>
>
> Is this still true?  Is it safe to use, at least in a read only
> situation?

Oh, I've never had a look into the man page. And I haven't beed using it fo=
r=20
long nor at high load scenarios but for me it works (tm).
In production I use it readonly but I also haven't had any problems in=20
read-write operation. But consider it as a nullfs-newbie report!

=2DHarry

>
> I have been remounting various parts of the filesystem in read only
> state using nfs from the local filesystem, ie,
>
> % mount localhost:/jailmaster/usr /jail/usr
>
> Chad
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

=2D-=20
Please never add my reply address to CC nor to the recipient list!
If you make "answers to all" please remove my address!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll complain if I see my reply address on any mailinglist!!!!!!!!

--Boundary-02=_tuTjAmlwnSXEhIH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAjTutBylq0S4AzzwRAsPJAJ92u/bEIES8KcEOJxRFcowGuhfUPQCfY3+P
d6PgTkdKgtrPdFYlCHSTDMc=
=CKbD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_tuTjAmlwnSXEhIH--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404261841.17705>