Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:50:47 +0100
From:      "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr@gahr.ch>
To:        Alexandr Kovalenko <alexandr.kovalenko@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net-im/openfire Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/net-im/openfire/files patch-build-build.xml
Message-ID:  <20110111125046.GH21802@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik=NFWYgAdafEk3N8-wfgsnbH6X_Y-=HkM3kwuJ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201101031236.p03CanQY094523@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTinmS957P%2BL8EX=o3rAq2ZjXy1DrfR684kkUP9RT@mail.gmail.com> <20110111081302.GD21802@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <AANLkTik4a_BH1DZt0cEh0nB1yg5RtM=XqwXkFeR8Xoo2@mail.gmail.com> <20110111111112.GG21802@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <AANLkTik=NFWYgAdafEk3N8-wfgsnbH6X_Y-=HkM3kwuJ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tvOENZuN7d6HfOWU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2011-Jan-11, 13:32, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> P.S. I suppose _after_ 3.7.0 _stable_ release it may be acceptable to
> go 2 different ways:
>=20
> 1. Create net-im/openfire37 leaving alone net-im/openfire
> 2. Repocopy net-im/openfire to net-im/openfire36 and commit of 3.7.0
> into net-im/openfire with adding note in UPDATING

Well, when 3.7.0 is released (stable) I'll update net-im/openfire to
3.7.0 and mark net-im/openfire-devel as INGORE or DEPRECATED.
I don't think I'm going to maintain a backport of 3.6.0, but anyone is
free to create a net-im/openfire36 if they like.

> To clarify - I'm not against seeing 3.7.0 in net-im/openfire, but
> against -beta there or appear it there without notice in UPDATING at
> least, because 3.6.x and 3.7.x are not completely backward compatible.

UPDATING is used when upgrading a port requires special actions to be
carried out. I'd like it not to become a general replacement for Release
Notes or ChangeLog files. I.e., it is the user's resposibility to go
find out what a new release of a software brings in terms of
retro-compatibility, and what is needed to upgrade one's configuration.

Anyway I'll double-check the release notes and make sure to make the
transition as clean as possible for our users.

Best Regards,

--=20
Pietro Cerutti
The FreeBSD Project
gahr@FreeBSD.org

PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp

--tvOENZuN7d6HfOWU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0sUiYACgkQwMJqmJVx947rKgCfVDDIlGP6C7qTTCIz8NS1+dM7
xbUAn3T5u0XXQIyLUzda6RDGxXYqBT6g
=XEof
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tvOENZuN7d6HfOWU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110111125046.GH21802>