From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 19 12:26:39 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3155B1065670
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ruben@verweg.com)
Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [IPv6:2a02:898:96::5e8e:f508])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E988FC0A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ruben@verweg.com)
Received: from guest-17.ripe.net (guest-17.ripe.net [193.0.2.17])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by erg.verweg.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5JCQU1U077017
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:26:35 GMT (envelope-from ruben@verweg.com)
Message-Id: <021E6A5D-F1BC-47DD-B860-F0AAC588F34C@verweg.com>
From: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com>
To: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A3B7E71.5000003@riscworks.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:26:29 +0200
References: <735E59909DEB44AF92825EA7C65CF430@ionicoffice.ionic.co.uk>
	<00265389C30B444288C246DF37651D0C249024DD1B@server-02.playsafesa.com>
	<h1forf$3lr$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<6101e8c40906190408h5b6a4496td12e2b9e4872459e@mail.gmail.com>
	<f663ee356bc7ad36ab5c63c0a4693f89.squirrel@www.thephinix.org>
	<4A3B7E71.5000003@riscworks.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12
	autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on erg.verweg.com
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2
	(erg.verweg.com [94.142.245.8]);
	Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:26:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:26:39 -0000


On 19 Jun 2009, at 14:02, Timo Schoeler wrote:

>>  Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
>> vice versa.

Above all, they contribute to the genetic diversity in the operating  
system pool.
Which is a good thing.

- Ruben