From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 18 10:58:59 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA23449 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jun 1995 10:58:59 -0700 Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA23441 ; Sun, 18 Jun 1995 10:58:58 -0700 Message-Id: <199506181758.KAA23441@freefall.cdrom.com> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Bruce Evans cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, ache@astral.msk.su, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Just FYI, gcc 2.7.0 is out, do we plan to switch to it? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jun 95 03:40:59 +1000." <199506181740.DAA03288@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 1995 10:58:57 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>> I think we should put it into 2.2 immediately (or maybe wait for 2.7.1). >>> >>2.7.0 -- no way. >>2.7.1 -- maybe >>2.7.2 -- probably. > >I want to get correct support for freebsd in it (it still has a 1.x >freebsd.h with the most inappropriate parts `#if 0'ed...). 2.7.1 may >be too late to start. 2.7.0 may be too late to start. > >Bruce I second Bruce on this. We have a "stable" branch now, so there is no harm in bringing a new gcc in now on the 2.2 branch. The sooner we know about the problems in the 2.7 series, the sooner we can work to get them fixed and report them back to the FSF. -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== Software Developer - Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================