Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:26:11 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_What_is_the_Right_Way=28=99=29_to_run_X?= =?windows-1252?Q?=3F?= Message-ID: <5DDB125E-A850-431C-B036-69EE9A0AAAED@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSuGKJ97O6aGJdCMqe=1157UzJoOLhwABai-FytqCbQ0YQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <82EEB5DC-DD57-4EC3-936A-2F28C4BAF0B4@dons.net.au> <CAPS9%2BSv8qcB7bLZ2BTRxggHBnB2e2pZ7mDbaRO7aLgkX4RiP=Q@mail.gmail.com> <AC17F1D0-8D69-41FE-B04C-8E5C34E17970@dons.net.au> <CAPS9%2BSuGKJ97O6aGJdCMqe=1157UzJoOLhwABai-FytqCbQ0YQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17/03/2013, at 23:00, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks promising. Just to make sure, have you verified that hald is = still running? Things can crash...=20 Yep, it's still running. >> > Have you tried to do the build from a clean environment? >=20 >> Not really, I can't just nuke the existing packages and do an install = (I suppose I could do it in a chroot). >=20 > That is a problem yes. Have you considered using poudriere to build = packages? It is rather nice, it can build old-school and new-school = packages, and is very configurable. It does require zfs though ;) I am using ZFS, I'll take a look :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5DDB125E-A850-431C-B036-69EE9A0AAAED>