From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Sep 26 11:52: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from noop.colo.erols.net (noop.colo.erols.net [207.96.1.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927AC15092; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gjp@noop.colo.erols.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=noop.colo.erols.net) by noop.colo.erols.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11VJPl-000GpC-00; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:52:49 -0400 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: jazepeda@pacbell.net (Alex Zepeda), chat@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org From: gjp@in-addr.com (Gary Palmer) Subject: Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:56:30 PDT." <199909261756.KAA10120@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: <64677.938371968@noop.colo.erols.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote in message ID <199909261756.KAA10120@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>: > [CC redirect to -chat, users left intact] > Should a BOF at BSDCon be asked for to discuss these issues? I think > it would make for a hot and heated BOF with lots of understanding > by both the ISP and user community about where the current state of the > art is headed with respect to filtering, redirection, and other tools > being applied to combat the spam problem. > I know there is one talk by jmb about spam, the past 5 years or something > along that line already. But this is such a hot topic that I am not sure > if he is going to get into what is currently being done, and what some of > the plans are. > > I also think that the open forum of a BOF would allow the implementers, > people like Paul Vixie, jmb, you, myself, etc to get a lot of input from > the general user community at large. I think an anti-spam BOF (or BOFH? :) ) would be a great idea. Its clear that this is a very touchy subject (heh, yes, I read NANAE :) ), and it would definately be illuminating for both customers and providers. Jordan, is there a BOF organizer for FreeBSD CON? Or is it just a organize it as you go structure? Do we even have rooms reserved for the evenings where BOFs could be held? (And, no, I'm not volunteering :) ) > This is what I was alluding to when I wrote: > ipfw add 10251 divert ${SMARTRELAYHANDLER} tcp from any to any 25 out via lnc > 1 > It's a layer 3 redirection of outbound SMTP attempts that would in effect > force the mail through our smart host without the customer even knowing > that we did it other than by header examination. At this point the > idea is just that, an idea. We will implement it if the current policy > does not solve the problem. This is one of the reasons we prefer running > a *BSD boarder router over a Cisco, we can do these things easily. Unfortunately, I don't know a BSD box that can handle aggregating OC3 or higher :( You fast run into the PCI bus wall. That and our routing ppl sorta like Cisco, for some unknown reason. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message