From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 8 19:05:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA23183 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from mars.abcinternet.net (root@mars.abcinternet.net [205.216.244.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA23132; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:25:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drow@drow.net) Received: from localhost (drow@localhost) by mars.abcinternet.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA03242; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 19:18:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 19:18:40 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Jacobowitz X-Sender: drow@mars.abcinternet.net To: Satoshi Asami cc: rone@bofh.noc.best.net, stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl, ports In-Reply-To: <199801080007.QAA16564@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * ===> perl-5.00404 : You have an old tcl installation on your machine. Remove everything that matches /usr/*/*tcl* first. > * > * That's a pretty bad pattern, since that includes, at the very least, > * /usr/ports and /usr/src, and that, according to bsd.port.mk, the only > * thing it's specifically complaining about is /usr/include/tcl.h. > > Well, see if you can get it to match anything in ports or src with > that pattern. I've tested it here, you know. :) Except, for instance, if you have compiled anything whose name contains tcl in /usr/src. It seems to me that using that many wildcards in an rm is just asking for angry admins. Dan