Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From:      Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: misc/9033: <sys/uio.h> refer to <sys/types.h>  but not include one
Message-ID:  <199812110620.WAA27413@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/9033; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: misc/9033: <sys/uio.h> refer to <sys/types.h>  but not include one
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 08:16:03 +0000

 Bruce Evans wrote:
 
 > >>Description:
 > >
 > >A.h refer to something, including in B.h, but A.h not include B.h .
 > >
 > >I think, this is design bug.
 > >
 > >In FreeBSD such situation, at least with <sys/uio.h> and <sys/types.h>,
 > >which breaks clear compiling of erlang.
 >
 > This is a (not very good, but...) design feature.  See `man 2 readv',
 > `man 2 writev' and `man 9 uio'.
 
  i. e. format of struct_iov in uio.uio_uov and readv is different ?
 
  format of uio_uov can be in general absolute any ?
 
   why this is not void * or union ?
 
 
 >
 >
 > Bruce
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812110620.WAA27413>