Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 04:36:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Wayne Baety <mrfoine@enteract.com> To: Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi> Cc: "'Brian Somers'" <brian@awfulhak.org>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>, "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: /var/run/natd.pid request Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970612043509.23547A-100000@enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <01BC772D.7D5DBC60@ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > On 12. kesakuuta 1997 11:41, Wayne Baety [SMTP:mrfoine@enteract.com] wrote: > > > > > > Well this is what i did a while back and needed the PID of natd....I think > > it requires procfs for the grepping of /proc thou.... I Just attached all > > of my cfg files for pppd..etc. Not sure if this was the best > > solution....but it worked for me. Also there is a script to return the > > pidof of a process by name....for the first match it prints just the PID > > but any other matches aren't parsed and status information is printed in > > the whole.....was a nice little script to get the PID of a named process > > quickly w/o using ps.....since at the time ps was crashing my -current. > > > > > > I browsed through your scripts: > > The reason why neither SIGHUP or -dynamic would work > for you is that you use -alias_address option. Dynamic features work > only if you give the name of interface (with -interface) option instead > of using -alias_address. > > Ari S. > I used -interface before and it wasnt working.....so I changed to specifying the alias_address my self and handling IP address changes myself....via pppd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970612043509.23547A-100000>