From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 26 17:46:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E922AB50D7 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:46:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7D828D for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBExR-1ajZ480FC1-00AEQL; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:46:09 +0100 Subject: Re: mail/postfix and mail/postfix-current need upgrading To: FreeBSD Ports References: <3f2105db035fe8b639905002c7524b45@mailbox.ijs.si> <56D052A0.9040106@madpilot.net> Cc: Carmel From: olli hauer Message-ID: <56D08FE8.9070905@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:48:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0Q4zdS094NC74nhQxcS+z4mOkHy+DZFT3JKOJqgiNChj4Czc8XA UJCX3c71AwNKw6LXpiVwfIc3biOP2neoFhEob7AryTXEkuWZnrC7u0exYs4luqR/lk8EdiW Jz1pNVH7B50gT2XxesZErPxqtsUFVf2gGapetMn0JecdX4f42FGxxRgOa7p5B839mQfrZCd 0YrXvrHgSK04Dkn1RbxIw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+oobohYWryw=:46k9KcUokrwTqXSCnx95Bu KSjjHbq3x0r8uOElKH2N1zzzawb7jwcxkoV3MZ93vdmXjNtyaPDh0p33MIhNLXYjw0WnHLbAc Oss/qawOL11EcZyd+LjF84NgyJjxO3f9tUyR3ziEJgT91HfixdRQCiobB2BcavV4LJUIlZ8x/ 7qCKysvfq/yP+ejDhMILcadlfhnqxQXQDf9HwqDlqMXUMTDAzulRqvh0IrgZro/JZxeLrVoZ1 EORD4sqZPlhR8KYbY8ehU+1j1pWK84JyXl9W5L3CEs6UQwtP7eElzFcyHbd3MVXMBMd3qWqYM 0ZKqwvSmbtnonN2i9Tt7T/+4BRS4EI+I8XHQ4qJKeY3rp0ekxSgQn0qIPRd0O57wPwgg8ifAF khVezRNV117LPKGruQQUfMwh+7aBLTvyeB1m3OvGU5gVxD3YNKo3TIwK9Y+Xt4oC4kziFt/zP t5aYfD+BtzNyA6pZleec+vqRKYJg6VNQtswIfisAH2ZBS+dmxnOEdWViO/OJMa/ma6Van3Y5J LV2ji+osUaIHSoRFMNhqLD7lQssUxr5cydA1bkxZ0ClZDYnkr4wOPFLPUtyv116R+rb/z/cls AqUWl/bGHFe8ACGcLz6Sv9j/SAZ6iRHLlMfIYl1xfcCgkv/Kchil3j4YpwIsYiWdRTVtalVWc vyuPYwAn2Y74hvKmESp4S8fKxzas0uTkbcCXqUpdJ690zJ0OgsVHGlwZ4mPUSGsu3ewJqBIOr ZlFUCM/EwLeKzJzacxz6fLnlK1NqNi9jUfm9+FJWA0r5y0JZEGU3imHnSvcR7ZVphn00RMRo7 ic6t9kI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:46:20 -0000 On 2016-02-26 14:45, Carmel wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:26:56 +0100, Guido Falsi stated: > >> On 02/26/16 14:16, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> In ports we have: >>> mail/postfix-current 2.11.7 >>> mail/postfix 2.8.0 >> >> Your information is outdated: >> >>> grep PORTVERSION /usr/ports/mail/postfix/Makefile >> PORTVERSION= 2.11.7 >> >> (you can also check http://www.freshports.org/mail/postfix/ ) >> >> Are you upgrading your ports tree regularly? > > Postfix 3.1 stable release > Postfix 3.2 experimental release > > Port: postfix-2.11.7_1,1 > Path: /usr/ports/mail/postfix > Info: Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail > > Port: postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 > Path: /usr/ports/mail/postfix-current > Info: Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail => since yesterday evening it is 3.0-20160204 but if you look at the DISTNAME you will see it is 3.0.4 > Obviously, the ports are not in sync with the current Stable and > Experimental branches of Postfix. No they are not and I plan the following to let users some time for the transition to 3.1. - mail/postfix (2.11.7) -> mail/postfix211 - mail/postfix-current (3.0.4) -> mail/postfix - postfix-current will be updated to 3.1.0 (released this week) In some weeks 3.1.x will become the default postfix, and 3.0.x will be removed from the tree, postfix211 will stay as the last postfix 2.x releases and current will become again current. There are some users using VDA patches, only available for postfix 2.8 but it also works on 2.11, there is no support from the VDA project for 3.x and it seems the VDA project is no longer alive.