From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Apr 1 21:56:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFD4D28D26; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 21:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC1362C; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 21:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 580BB12DD; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 21:56:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Cy Schubert , Jason Unovitch , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs References: <201704012020.v31KKM24033490@slippy.cwsent.com> <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 23:58:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc> (Mathieu Arnold's message of "Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:40:24 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 21:56:33 -0000 Mathieu Arnold writes: > Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 22:20, Cy Schubert a =C3=A9crit : > >> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitc= h=20 >> write >> s: >>> Author: junovitch >>> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 >>> New Revision: 416439 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439 >>> >>> Log: >>> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter >>>=20=20=20 >>> PR: 209976 >>> Submitted by: Du=C3=85=C2=A1an Vejnovi=C3=84=C2=8D >> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It= =20 >> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch = was=20 >> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed? > > The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well, > they do. Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake more than once in the past.