Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:28:01 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: roberto.trovo@redix.it Cc: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR Status i386/62374 Message-ID: <20040409192800.GB1006@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <65229.192.168.0.77.1081438325.squirrel@mail.redix.it> References: <65229.192.168.0.77.1081438325.squirrel@mail.redix.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.04.08 17:32:05 +0200, roberto.trovo@redix.it wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hi, > On febrary 5th I've submitted a PR: i386/62374,but I've not recevived any > feedback; >=20 > I'd like to know: > - I'm wrong in the pr-submission? > - Is it not a bug? > - It is not a new bug/ another pr is on the same bug? > - anything else? >=20 > I'd like to know what's happening... I just checked the PR and it in fact do look like a real bug in ipf (but I'm no kernel hacker so I could be wrong). The bug rapport looks good (has backtraces and so on), but the category should be 'kern' since it doesn't look i386 specific. Most PR's filed with category 'i386' are bogus and/or contains no details, so it's easy for real PR's to get lost in the noise. Anyway, I just reassigned the PR to the ipf maintainer so hopefully he has an idea about what goes wrong. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAdvlAh9pcDSc1mlERAtt0AJ49gQJjGX3yPeVph1mfvBrS8M5MhQCgojDO boWJDk3VVCeKvkdsncyw7zs= =nwe7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040409192800.GB1006>