From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 22 12:25:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D58494 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog111.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog111.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7B52ADE for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob111.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUe0kuxLdcqA0emJmuNnT+YMVngAMliNo@postini.com; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:25:59 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y10so5871551wgg.8 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to:in-reply-to :x-gm-message-state; bh=eSUAlEOIRqekVqcIE5OcadJ99NJDYI438aXeMQfZW7E=; b=lRZfykAlDb/MHH4vcghKx36TWeOLEf2Xvicsyl9DbMAzS1xlDdfaNYRfO7P68W1CXC D66dGPPWMkGGjYESxzB7XrYBVD5orgu3DnWv1ZAZXhkAzgNSY5AwIyMIfMB3rn2E2+qc WX1gVct1reA1Xb5E/OtXTJiDmprF+eZgeVNH+vOhEerzez7n4mr7OzCo4AI4klj2J4rl wlWKh613J9tMkgIrpQCYAMgpYLQzbF0M8HY9Phwfco4rCXzjKLpIoL9cw7DByzX8NVZa oxyAnLcU7euwnZbolC31+rM32A00CDAMIhAfT610OF7HzeQXeP0P+yieU4zWdPiUEWZP gj6g== X-Received: by 10.194.9.70 with SMTP id x6mr8480926wja.19.1374495931173; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.9.70 with SMTP id x6mr8480918wja.19.1374495931096; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mb20sm52451252wic.1.2013.07.22.05.25.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 05:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r6MCPRW5049242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:25:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) id r6MCPRDd049241; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:25:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:25:27 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201307221225.r6MCPRDd049241@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is portmaster --check-port-dbdir obsolete? In-Reply-To: <51EC8006.3070909@FreeBSD.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwWiIaYYTpSom5K/6sTN0KvKUW7SCJfu/5Tg/884Qwq0gof7qmmRd2kxU4p25MBKKkw3/w6DW8Sd4kVFuqGwruHTJ5LbGJOFIHZL3gkSvFw3kovY4bP9ghQWeenohT+OA33kHvPqk9IH0cQw18y4dGYU4Pv4POLVZ4XSrRapg7+Qz8KNk= Cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:25:59 -0000 >From bdrewery@freebsd.org Mon Jul 22 02:36:18 2013 > >On 7/8/2013 7:04 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 7/8/2013 5:52 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> With ports tree at r322480, I updated >>> several ports with portmaster. >>> >>> "pkg check -srda" did not find any problems, but >>> >>> >>> # portmaster --check-port-dbdir >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Building list of installed port names >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Checking /var/db/ports >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> devel_apr1 does not seem to be installed >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/devel_apr1? y/n [n]=20 >>> >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> math_gmp does not seem to be installed >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/math_gmp? y/n [n]=20 >>> >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> www_serf does not seem to be installed >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D>>> Delete /var/db/ports/www_serf? y/n [n]=20 >>> >>> >>> #=20 >>> >>> So is "portmaster --check-port-dbdir" an obsolete check? >>> If so, will this option be removed in future versions? >>> >>> Anton >>=20 >> It's not obsolete. I just need to update it to recognize the new format= >=2E >>=20 >> https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/issues/25 >>=20 >>=20 > >This is now fixed in 3.17.1. Just committed to ports. $ pkg version -vx portma portmaster-3.17.1 = up-to-date with port $ # portmaster --check-port-dbdir ===>>> Building list of installed port names ===>>> py-qt4-assistant does not seem to be installed ===>>> Delete /var/db/ports/py-qt4-assistant? y/n [n] ===>>> py-qt4-core does not seem to be installed ===>>> Delete /var/db/ports/py-qt4-core? y/n [n] ===>>> py-qt4-gui does not seem to be installed ===>>> Delete /var/db/ports/py-qt4-gui? y/n [n] ===>>> py-qt4-network does not seem to be installed ===>>> Delete /var/db/ports/py-qt4-network? y/n [n] $ pkg info -xo py27-qt4 py27-qt4-assistant-4.10.2,1 devel/py-qt4-assistant py27-qt4-core-4.10.2,1 devel/py-qt4-core py27-qt4-gui-4.10.2,1 x11-toolkits/py-qt4-gui py27-qt4-network-4.10.2,1 net/py-qt4-network $ I think this is because these ports start with "py" in some places, but with "py27" in others. Thanks Anton