From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 29 20:06:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5C96E5
 for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:06:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1FF7DB
 for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:06:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id z60so322794qgd.36
 for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=NHcvWf44fVT73vkAfkH1haQmqLH5NJxrhPakqpsfcFs=;
 b=O6AF8eonwDaakazfpRuPI3oNnQKLYgrlYdThEyZ/+HAzcun8vAg79bLfVL4JNucaq/
 zJjDquLx5AVaubs7ngfGLyRT0D0b9C9PEy+K9BLkO5bo/SqWMG2k0XFdiaA74Buyd1Iw
 Qbvwc0l0GlMt703KiaStEfCvukpGHxfkZ1y4w3yuBbwoIz+mseldGee6CWmu98rxjU9G
 cioQw6tEbshsax6iQRJT0I5qjvT043egENCgGaeBSCntJOAsha8A+gRYwFUFJ7sx2o/B
 FcbaQ1BntEHOwy4EvZ+NlwllOYFTlQ4LnSee7sLd7O/oMo3TZtu7fXb9lQSK2jyAf2TT
 82DA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.66.74 with SMTP id m10mr17512273qai.14.1396123618877;
 Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.50.143 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonMkrOQp=VudKrzDfQ7nNLAfHbocYkPZoqjrfqhWRAghQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140314230013.GA25473@ns.umpquanet.com>
 <CAJ-VmonmH1vDqtL=Pu6sG53Ro-3DyC5QmtKtUJtvZmTDbM0Aug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmomfR5YQqaj8pYB80tLEdEcJjP0a+1tXqE6V1-Tpo7MLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140315010640.GB65392@ns.umpquanet.com>
 <CAJ-VmokGv2Ug7PDc6LcR+p=A2te5L6QuOoY1vrO9d0yhiZJ9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonLYQn4X+eOcegOuOZ8J0TchaEfrVc7Yhg9TJsHOWC2Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmo=0HNAHUX5ZbamN+djJXzUY9zBEzXcNC_fpgzfrieLhhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonMkrOQp=VudKrzDfQ7nNLAfHbocYkPZoqjrfqhWRAghQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:06:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=R5Hq4TuLJEoo8sJzvvUa1goi=PKkTiWDyQmDabiW1+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Poor performance w/Intel 2200BG (iwi) on FreeBSD 9.2
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To: Jim Long <james@museum.rain.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
 tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:07:00 -0000

.. actually, this is even more screwed up. here's what I get in the RX
notification messages:

time=3D1396123498.839215
g 9     %    =EF=BF=BD  =02
=EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD  $ =EF=BF=BD =
=EF=BF=BD =16 D   =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD
=EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD P =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =03     E
U =EF=BF=BD   @ =11  =EF=BF=BD
 =01  =EF=BF=BD
 =01  =EF=BF=BD
D \ D \  z =EF=BF=BD d { " h o s t _ i
n t " :   7 4 0 7 6 9 6 2 7 ,
" v e r s i o n " :   [ 1 ,   8
] ,   " d i s p l a y n a m e "
:   " " ,   " p o r t " :   =02
 --


.. it is actually looking like this is 'old' data in the receive
buffer and I'm not actually seeing valid data. I'll go and check
further.

Thanks!

-a