From owner-freebsd-gnome Sat Nov 9 10: 8: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D118E37B401 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6C143E4A for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:07:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gA9I5S01039876; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:05:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: gnometerminal-2.1.1 From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Glenn Johnson Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users In-Reply-To: <20021109172134.GA1346@gforce.johnson.home> References: <1036835912.350.5.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20021109172134.GA1346@gforce.johnson.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-P49e2YyBqI6weJzyymEk" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 09 Nov 2002 13:07:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1036865272.2487.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-P49e2YyBqI6weJzyymEk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 12:21, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 04:58:32AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > For those testing the new GNOME 2.1 desktop, you're in for a treat. I > > enabled VTE support in the new gnometerminal-2.1.1, and now the main > > terminal window is anti-aliased. It looks quite nice, and, since it's > > rendered with Xft, the performance is pretty good, too. >=20 > Is there any chance of this version of gnometerminal working with Gnome > 2.0? You could install it if you want. >=20 > Is it possible to have Gnome 2.1 installed along with Gnome 2.0 for > testing purposes? No, they are mutually exclusive. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-P49e2YyBqI6weJzyymEk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9zU73b2iPiv4Uz4cRAqpYAJsFaIb2XGTBXQ/A7r4VmCuwyD40ggCdFMOm n3FdoKiaeAgMyDxekz2q0M8= =FGvn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P49e2YyBqI6weJzyymEk-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message