From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 06:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A6106566C for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE398FC08 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so2038061vws.13 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:21:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; bh=AibrsqPvk0Rp6cx3EPLpUGSwOBN+IucXwRygRZN4UAU=; b=d+Y57JYGNrGWugUNnZd9W7a9FIwyevt6F9ZZ5CNV+6AdWzVYTHmox3GhJPVdfslSDi Wo8Zk8SSSRqSU8Nlt6dQjV4NFzfLfpOISvw3Ltnf/YnPlBsrSJDIs3/roXKqLYN0rEjL Ah7xVTPSs8GwA44OFPPCOlGWH2pimqZTzuUi4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; b=YhWox3YCqQgkLSYCwg77WOMiR9ojl1AdBXZ66TunFrUGSS3ch446Wu0QNU5AKuLoo7 7cZ3qqagbwwx5NhCo8p9tsPyCNWExsC5n+p+Cmnu6AiEv5+qQBqisg6Jqt4gBC9lo7hD vBnse3FYSRb5cnbsA23dHqmAh3SKEqVXnyork= Received: by 10.220.108.31 with SMTP id d31mr2917897vcp.57.1265437274201; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:21:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from centel.dataix.local (ppp-22.17.dialinfree.com [209.172.22.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 42sm19223769vws.12.2010.02.05.22.20.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:21:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 01:20:22 -0500 From: jhell To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100205225039.GA81606@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x89D8547E X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 85EF E26B 07BB 3777 76BE B12A 9057 8789 89D8 547E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-src@yandex.ru Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:21:15 -0000 On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:59, mezz7@ wrote: > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:09 -0600, jhell wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-src@yandex.ru wrote: >>>> Hi there. >>>> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the >>>> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can >>>> anybody shed the light what was changed? >>> >>> The graphics/jpeg port was updated such that the version number of >>> libjpeg.so was increased. This necessitated a revision bump in all the >>> ports that depend on graphics/jpeg. There are *many* such ports. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> [root@smeshariki2 ~]# portsnap fetch >>>> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. >>>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. >>>> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >>>> Updating from Fri Feb 5 06:44:34 MSK 2010 to Fri Feb 5 15:57:40 MSK >>>> 2010. >>>> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >>>> Applying metadata patches... done. >>>> Fetching 0 metadata files... done. >>>> Fetching 4282 patches..... >>> >> >> >> I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this >> type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made.... > > Read this: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-January/059241.html > >> Guess that doesn't stand for everything. > > Stick to package if you can't handle it. > Is this just one package that I'm allowed or can I use packages too ? ;) Insightful. I don't see how this warranted that I can't handle it but hey to each his own opinion. It's a question. GAL >> Was there some type of security concern that caused this bump of jpeg in >> the first place or was it just a creeping featurism? > -- jhell