Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Mar 2015 21:09:54 +0100
From:      John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
To:        Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>,  John Marino <marino@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r380211 - head/security/libgpg-error
Message-ID:  <54F37212.3010800@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <CAALwa8m=%2B6ADnKtUaNFxY10jFjJsD%2BzZOARRn8RTxoMOd1S1JA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201503011652.t21GqiLh056130@svn.freebsd.org>	<CAALwa8mhQ7bX5TeaUa7Wrw7fy5TV0ZxZqOS_Zjs3tAC-MUf5LQ@mail.gmail.com>	<54F3458E.8090401@marino.st>	<CAALwa8nnv3a7GpOqbe%2BBatjmeW-_mba2iaSok3iOWrP_EMZOnw@mail.gmail.com>	<54F34DC3.8020902@marino.st>	<CAALwa8n6hR8aYw7Z=b-JGUyG3u4_HLvNgJDZT%2BXgqkCnjoHZnA@mail.gmail.com>	<54F35AAD.5010200@marino.st>	<CAALwa8mk8-eGWmg6QYcFqkt%2BSR687YZqq0tTcegf%2BEwJbX8kxg@mail.gmail.com>	<54F3678C.90706@marino.st> <CAALwa8m=%2B6ADnKtUaNFxY10jFjJsD%2BzZOARRn8RTxoMOd1S1JA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/1/2015 21:05, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:25 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> wrote:
>> On 3/1/2015 19:46, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>>> Can you try using cpp5 -P instead of cpp5?
>>> See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-5/porting_to.html
>>>
>>
>> It works.  If I just add "CPP= cpp -P" to the stock port makefile, then
>> it builds fine.  I check "cpp -P" on FreeBSD 10, it seems clang cpp just
>> ignores the -P even though it's not a listed option.
>>
>> I guess if we want to use this, the fix would be something like
>> "CPP+= -P"
>>
>> Would all the FreeBSD releases accept "CPP+= -P" ?
> 
> I tested the src/Makefile.in part of
> https://build.opensuse.org/source/openSUSE:Factory/libgpg-error/libgpg-error-1.18-gcc5.patch
> on FreeBSD 8.4 / 9.3 / 10.1 / head / head with clang 3.6 and it
> worked.

Nice to know.  What is the rationale for patching the makefiles if
defining CPP in the environment has the same result?

Just curious because it seems that "CPP+= -P" saves three patches and
I'd think that would be desired.

John




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54F37212.3010800>