Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:39:31 +0200 From: Pierre Beyssac <Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr> To: Dusk Auriel Sykotik <syko@sykotik.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: dg@root.com, narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd@xaa.iae.nl Subject: Re: memory leaks in libc Message-ID: <19980806183931.A5235@mars.hsc.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980806120525.8578C-100000@vortex.starix.net>; from Dusk Auriel Sykotik on Thu, Aug 06, 1998 at 12:07:04PM -0400 References: <199808061335.XAA23389@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <Pine.LNX.3.95.980806120525.8578C-100000@vortex.starix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 06, 1998 at 12:07:04PM -0400, Dusk Auriel Sykotik wrote: > Apache uses them quite frequently. And this could make it very costly on > large webservers. Where I work, we have hundreds of connections to some Apparently, from a very quick glance at Apache code, it looks like Apache handles environment stuff by itself (without setenv) before handling it to external programs. > of our webservers per minute. We also use cgi scripts very frequently, > and these use *env* functions quite frequently as well. cgi scripts are short lived, so memory leaks here are short lived too and much less of a problem. -- Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980806183931.A5235>