Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 10:49:23 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: atrens@nortel.ca Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Atrens@foo.osd.bsdi.com, "Andrew [SKY:ET95:EXCH]" <atrens@americasm01.nt.com> Subject: RE: possibly related data point - (was) Re: Current Broken! Message-ID: <XFMail.001208104923.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0012081205110.75644-100000@hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Dec-00 atrens@nortel.ca wrote: > > I hit on it by accident (I normally compile with -O). That said, your > claim that gcc with no optimization generates incorrect code is > kind of counter-intuitive, wouldn't you say ? I've seen it do weird things with -O0 (mostly with C++). :) It's just another program. Nothing is keeping it from having bugs. :) > I think you missed my point, I was just illustrating that optimizer seems > to affect (in my case apparently negate) the processing of constraints. I am back now to thinking that it is a gcc bug in the -O case now as well. The constraings I removed were in fact valid, so I've put them back in, but just disabled the macros for now until gcc is fixed. > What you take from that is up to you - I was just trying to be helpful :) Sorry if I came across as if I was biting your head off, that was not the intent. > Cheers, > > A. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.Baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.001208104923.jhb>