From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 15:33:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2959D16A4CF for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:33:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lightandmatter.com (lightandmatter.com [64.246.48.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FB343D54 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:33:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcrowell@lightandmatter.com) Received: (from bcrowell@localhost) by lightandmatter.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i5NFcZo06601 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:38:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:38:34 -0500 From: Ben Crowell To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040623103834.B6573@lightandmatter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: Re: listing ports@FreeBSD.org as maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:33:18 -0000 >> I'd like to suggest that if the maintainer of a port doesn't want to >> list his >> own address, READMEs should just read like this: >>

If needed, you may contact the port > "mailto:ports at FreeBSD.org">mailing-list.

>These ports are free for adoption, so there is no maintainer >involved. The READMEs are generated by a script, you want want >to provide a patch. Sure, sounds like a good idea. Where is the script?