Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:07:49 -0800 (PST)
From:      Darren Pilgrim <dmp@aracnet.com>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Optimal UFS parameters 
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012071319240.11097-100000@shell1.aracnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200012072056.eB7Ku3112378@earth.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a interesting topic (to me, anyway), and is one of the things that
often gets overlooked by those of us with less experience.  Rather than
getting into a long discussion about modifying the newfs defaults across
the board, what if the newfs options used were based on the size of
the FS?  There could be a simple rule in sysinstall that increased the
newfs options from their default values if the defaults meant there would
be more an x number of inodes and cg's.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0012071319240.11097-100000>