Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:30:09 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP Message-ID: <4F0C4B71.8060606@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl> References: <CAJxePNJcTh0QZfr_YOLwN-R1nOrdJETxgMPPm78S35MAsipsug@mail.gmail.com> <aef8c5199b6d01d3fc5d21ac120574a7.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> <CAJxePN%2BGKorAeHCh0HRfUqwAOJ-x%2B_xtPiHk_XDuRAmJWYdgoQ@mail.gmail.com> <BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com> <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: >> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: >>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? >> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the >> precompiled package you got used. While many people want PHP in the >> form of an Apache module, other folks use it via fastcgi and so forth... > Yes that might be so. But it's far better to *have* this module and > disable it in Apache than not have it at all and for that reason only > *buiild* apache from ports in stead of using a package. > Yeah, no thank you. What about those people that don't even *use* apache and want to install PHP ? We get stuck with a useless module ? Really, *no thank you*
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0C4B71.8060606>