Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 00:10:13 +0100 From: Jez Hancock <jez.hancock@munk.nu> To: FreeBSD questions List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to find out available "make" arguments Message-ID: <20030505231013.GA88545@users.munk.nu> In-Reply-To: <20030503084738.GE17027@ns2.wananchi.com> References: <3EB2B0E4.5000309@netscape.net> <20030502185938.GA22693@users.munk.nu> <20030503084738.GE17027@ns2.wananchi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 11:47:38AM +0300, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: > * Jez Hancock <jez.hancock@munk.nu> [20030502 21:58]: wrote: > > > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk > ^ that s ;-) Sorry - my bad - I should have checked before I typed frantically :/ > > cd /usr/ports/Mk > > ls -al > > read what you want, maybe :) > > I did `man ports` and wondered if all-depends-list was deprecated... No idea I'm afraid... I'm grappling with diff files and 'patch' right now, great fun... in a tooth-pulling fun kind of way :) Incidentally I don't think the example I gave of apache/suexec was a very good one - totally by coincidence (isn't it always?) I'm attempting to build apache with suexec support right now and doing this: [18:02:20] root@whitestar /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl# make \ -DWITH_APACHE_SUEXEC -DAPACHE_SUEXEC_DOCROOT=/www -DAPACHE_SUEXEC_USERDIR=/www isn't enabling apache-suexec, let alone any of the other options :( I just found this thread totally by coincidence like I say after searching for help on the topic: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=105195202218567&w=2 saw the name in the first result there and thought mmm, that name's familiar :)) Ah well back to my search, Cheers, Jez PS Have you come across portupgrade - v useful tool for keeping ports up to date...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030505231013.GA88545>