Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 2000 10:57:14 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Bob K <melange@yip.org>
To:        Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Server Farms? 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005121056040.16302-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005121039310.9869-100000@search.sparks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 May 2000, David Miller wrote:

> On Thu, 11 May 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 May 2000, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> > 
> > >For the record, though, what *are* the "good" ones?  I looked for the
> > >Equinox mentioned earlier on on Ebay and didn't find any.
> > 
> > Generially anything which will provide you an IP layer is the best
> > option.  Livingston Portmasters are what first come to mind.  There are
> > other solutions provided by various companies including 3Com.  Generally
> > those things get to be pretty expensive though.  You might look for
> > completely serial layer solutions from companies like Stallion,
> > Lantronix, or even and old DEC box.  You just have to dig to find this
> > stuff.
> 
> Portmasters are rock solid stable and would do very nicely.  There should
> be a ton of them available cheap from ISP's all over who have converted to
> digital access for 56K modems.  Once you had to take PRI/CT1 in the
> portmasters were useless.  Easy to configure too.

Another solution that works fairly well that you may have lying around
idle are Cisco 2511's.

-- 
Bob <melange@yip.org>
"Reality is the only word in the language that should always be used
		in quotes" - My Life With The Thrill Kill Kult sample



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005121056040.16302-100000>