Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:40:41 +0200 From: Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/pf/net if_pflog.c if_pfsync.c pf_ioctl.c Message-ID: <20040914154041.GF3410@miranda.expro.pl> In-Reply-To: <200409141730.48040.max@love2party.net> References: <200409140312.i8E3C1Kw099837@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040914152935.GE3410@miranda.expro.pl> <200409141730.48040.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 05:30:33PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Tuesday 14 September 2004 17:29, Jan Srzednicki wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:12:01AM +0000, Max Laier wrote: > > > it is save to call if_attachdomain from if_attach() (as done for > > > if_loop.c). We will now end up with a properly initialized if_afdata > > > array and the nd6 callout will no longer try to deref a NULL pointer. > > > > Is this likely to fix a very similar panic in in6_tmpaddrtimer() I've > > also reported? > > PR#, ML-thread etc. ??? Thread on current@, started with a subject "5.3-BETA3 panic, probably IPv6+SMP+mpsafenet related"; after applying Robert's workaround for nd6_slowtimo() panic, I started getting the in6_tmpaddrtimer() one. The panic report is here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/036623.html -- Jan 'Winfried' Srzednicki w@expro.pl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040914154041.GF3410>