Date: 22 Jan 2001 03:37:17 -0500 From: Arcady Genkin <antipode@thpoon.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, cjclark@alum.mit.edu Subject: Re: stunnel configuration (-l option) Message-ID: <87puhg2daa.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> In-Reply-To: <20010121214404.G10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> References: <874rys45pu.fsf@tea.thpoon.com> <20010121214404.G10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> writes: > # stunnel -d 993 -l /usr/local/libexec/imapd -- imapd > > Doesn't work? Once someone connects, a separate stunnel should fork > leaving the listener bound on 993/tcp. No, it doesn't work. :( It works fine so long as there are no concurrent accesses from several hosts. That is, I can connect from one machine (even with different user names) many consequent times. Then I can do the same from another machine. But as soon as I request update of my IMAP folders from my workstation (and my IMAP folders are many and huge), and attempt to update IMAP folders from another computer in parallel, the process hangs on BOTH computers, and I have to kill and restart stunnel. This does not happen when I use "-r localhost:imap" instead of "-l ..." Any ideas? -- Arcady Genkin Don't read everything you believe. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87puhg2daa.fsf>