Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:19:28 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>, Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man3 queue.3 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201031117020.24204-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <951.1010057694@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > If for instance we (re)introduce CIRCLEQ or certain other queue > types, it is by no means obvious that the continuation clause > of the FOREACH() will be "!= NULL". But that would not be TAILQ_FOREACH, which is the only one I'm talking about. So it's irrelevant, and WHY it's behaviour should be documented. so that you can tell the difference between the behaviour of a TAILQ_FOREACH and CIRCLEQ_FOREACH. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201031117020.24204-100000>