Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: pointyhat is building for 5.5 but claiming 8.0
Message-ID:  <4784072D.9040003@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1199834453.74596.157.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
References:  <61565506@bb.ipt.ru> <4783E1C6.50001@FreeBSD.org>	 <95483459@bb.ipt.ru> <1199830245.74596.155.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>	 <63313519@bb.ipt.ru> <1199834453.74596.157.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>
>>>>> No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
>>>>> be wrapped.
>>>> Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
>>>> an error for this port.
>>> The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host?
>> OK, I found the difference. The port builds for all FreeBSD version
>> except 5.x. The same is for ports-mgmt/tinderbox. Thus I think that
>> there is something that was not MFS'd to 5-STABLE that causes the
>> difference.
>>
>> For now I'm going to mark the port as IGNORE for OSVERSION < 600000.
>> A question to portmgr@: Do you have any objections?
> 
> It would be nice to know what exactly is going on in there.

Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be, unless it is using uname(1) or 
(3) and 5.x doesn't have the environment variable overrides...but in 
that case hundreds of other things would break.

Kris





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4784072D.9040003>