Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 14:54:12 +0000 From: myfreeweb <greg@unrelenting.technology> To: Dan Kotowski <dan.kotowski@a9development.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X Message-ID: <31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <ShdSNL8XDgj0KtPR4v8nn1ohjVssrnoUQGwNL-gHOpylio7Eo5J_WjA2Ko9YjV5md64MeFz017Ts01KUnpJa3Xpw4y_PncL4e5cfUcotRWM=@a9development.com> References: <fn58k-44ZAkuwnDdytVzV-cLaB9amYMgZWydbpR_muUcKNZwohKqn9zFxqqw_Vz8Ij8L8yOSv0XhefrcTSo_bSYSOe5_7wcjoBWl8Q2dDVM=@a9development.com> <37858865a8ebddd3fe1e3a228a19ef62@unrelenting.technology> <7066da0bc417ed047dc27b4741c90e81@unrelenting.technology> <xoiJF1ZUP3-rgbxC8ZmJGQNpsJSyK4zsAXhbLl8Ml96Da1lBPGwPqn0ANf7q-GgthPAWePSR9QDCM5vKysd_3e2aGtp-0egUXu6AW3bhLDg=@a9development.com> <CANCZdfqbd_u35toFYKr4LKkCBwnRhutM5knjnVcGR018Jfo1Vw@mail.gmail.com> <664db38a87ea8803be72af9738534994@unrelenting.technology> <b5105ce888b7a91eff50ec9118a910a8@unrelenting.technology> <8951311F-77F7-40B8-AEA0-F8CBCB1A05DE@yahoo.com> <4ad62e6669044f82e71a9d86fd493356@unrelenting.technology> <ShdSNL8XDgj0KtPR4v8nn1ohjVssrnoUQGwNL-gHOpylio7Eo5J_WjA2Ko9YjV5md64MeFz017Ts01KUnpJa3Xpw4y_PncL4e5cfUcotRWM=@a9development.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 31, 2020 2:31:03 PM UTC, Dan Kotowski <dan=2Ekotowski@a9development= =2Ecom> wrote: >> I've sent a link to a known firmware build before: >> https://drive=2Egoogle=2Ecom/file/d/1yXSS1O1U8CmtwaIPfxNDkzhAClJGvErK/v= iew >> Have you tried it? Any difference in FreeBSD/NetBSD, with NVMe? > >I decided to go back to the UEFI sources and have found some differences = that I think need to be reconciled before moving forward=2E That said, I'm = not an ACPI wizard by any means - for me it's low-level mage spells at best= =2E=2E=2E > >In https://github=2Ecom/SolidRun/edk2-platforms we have 2 different branc= hes that SolidRun seems to use: > >1=2E LSDK-19=2E09-sr >2=2E master-lx2160a > >I've been building from the latter branch, but found some significant dif= ferences in the former that I think may be important to merge in=2E To me it seems like 19=2E09 is just outdated and doesn't have any benefits= =2E Ask the solidrun people to be sure=2E Either way, nothing here would fix the interrupt bug=2E It's *our* bug sin= ce NetBSD works fine :(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31D3FA64-8296-4CA5-92A2-F7FE7C4AE981>