Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Dec 2013 01:50:37 +0100
From:      Polytropon <>
To:        Lokadamus <>
Subject:   Re: Probs with FreeBSD 10- Beta/ RC and Xorg
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:50:55 +0100, Lokadamus wrote:
> Compile xorg from ports needs 2 days to compile on my old P4- 3GHz. This 
> is not an Option. :(

Excuse my question - is this _for real_? I've been using a P4 2 GHz
for many years and didn't have such high compile times. Yes, sure,
compiling stuff like or OpenOffice may take some hours, even
the OS needs few hours, and a kernel half an hour, but TWO DAYS
really sounds too high...

I've been compiling a FreeBSD v4 OS on a 150 MHz Pentium ("P1")
with 64 MB (Megabytes!) RAM once which required almost 24 hours.
But the time invested was _well_ invested: When everything was
installed, configured, tweaked and tuned, that particular system
would run X, WindowMaker, xmms (MP3 player), mplayer (video),
Opera (web browser), wget and some new compile jobs _at the same
time_ without "skipping audio" - the thing many users of "modern"
computers seem to complain when they move a window across the
screen - and the web browser and GUI still being fully responsive.
>From today's point of view, that sounds like magic. :-)

Of course, you're talking about _today's_ which might be much
more voluminous than 5 years ago. On the other hand, what
about the modularity? isn't a steaming pile of source code
anymore, there are many optional parts.

Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>