From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 18:06:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED6A16A419 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@varusonline.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ED313C45B for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@varusonline.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3909880waf for ; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.176.1 with SMTP id y1mr1716491wae.1196532415640; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from Serval.local ( [24.153.116.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q34sm6731331wrq.2007.12.01.10.06.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:06:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4751A309.3040206@varusonline.com> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:08:09 -0500 From: Jessica Mahoney Organization: Varus Online User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Pilgrim References: <474E80CD.3020803@varusonline.com> <47518B5D.1040105@bitfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <47518B5D.1040105@bitfreak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Laptop] Battery Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:06:56 -0000 Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Jessica Mahoney wrote: >> Quick recap: >> Windows Vista: 2 minute boot, 90 minutes of battery > > What tuning did you do on Vista prior to your measurements? A stock > Vista install never actually goes idle, so it eats the battery life. > > With FreeBSD if you run X with an alpha-blending WM and a background > process to continually keep the CPU 10-20% loaded and the disk active, > you also get poor battery life. > > Vista, when properly tuned, will get better battery life than Vista > because it can also turn off devices to save power. FreeBSD lacks the > ability to power down USB, wireless and wired net devices, CD/DVD > drives, etc. > I had enabled everything in the Power Management panel in Vista (six dots for Power Saving, no dots for Performance), and had the flat panel at its dimmest setting. With FreeBSD, I had the panel at its dimmest setting, average CPU load 2-5%, and had the CPU running at 800MHz. I have no idea what the CPU clock was while running Vista, since there doesn't seem to be a CPU clock monitor in Vista.