Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:36:18 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc? Message-ID: <20031028163617.GE570@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <200310281607.QAA08679@rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> References: <200310281607.QAA08679@rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:07:13PM +0000, Richard Tobin wrote: > > > I think ISO-C is pretty clear here. > > It would be wise to raise this on comp.std.c which is read by several > of the ISO C standard authors. Things that seem "pretty clear" often > turn out not to be... This topic is discussed almost once per year in comp.std.c, see e.g. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=esvRTfAyaFy2Ewgv%40on-the-train.demon.co.uk for a reply from a member of JTC1/SC22/WG14. FreeBSD's *scanf() implementation seems to be just fine. Cheers, Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031028163617.GE570>