Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1995 19:19:06 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Non-Intel Hardware and FreeBSD Message-ID: <199509090219.TAA00670@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Sep 1995 17:49:32 PDT." <460.810607772@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Okay, I confess: I am very weird ! The way I looked at it was different . It at least identified who was doing what and on the passing I saw a few bits of information about hardware. My take on the situation is that for a multiple platform port we need apps, apps and more apps. If I am going to be running the same apps that I am running right now, I rather stay with Intel and enjoy the wide choice of apps for different OSes . Amancio >>> "Jordan K. Hubbard" said: > > Not sure if this applicable however on comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc > > there was an interesting thread of netbsd slugging it out with > > Linus. The center topic was linux and netbsd on different platforms. > > Neither applicable nor even very interesting (I read it). This was > just another noise fest between NetBSD proponents slagging off Linux > for its cross-platform source tree structure and Linus defending it. > > Linux has simply done things differently and if anyone thinks that > there is One True Way of organizing source code then the only likely > truth is that they just left college and haven't been in this business > very long.. :-) > > Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509090219.TAA00670>