From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 29 05:25:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5480C37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web9603.mail.yahoo.com (web9603.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.129.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E441A43F75
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from chancedj@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030429122553.70498.qmail@web9603.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.73.195.110] by web9603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:25:53 PDT
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daryl Chance <chancedj@yahoo.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030428.211423.67343139.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: chancedj@yahoo.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:25:54 -0000


--- "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> In message:
> <20030428204619.76247.qmail@web9608.mail.yahoo.com>
>             Daryl Chance <chancedj@yahoo.com>
> writes:
> : I assume, from the little bit of research I've
> done on
> : this, that it's harmless, but annoying.  Is this
> : something that you're wanting to fix before 5.1R? 
> If
> : so, I won't mind helping locate it.
> 
> Yes.  Harmless yet annoying.
> 
> Warner
ok.  but is it something that you guys want to fix? Or
is it just way too low on the list of priorities for
you to get to right now(since it's only annoying and
doesn't break anything right now)?  If so, anyone mind
providing some input on how I would go about trying to
find it?  I can give it my best shot at least :).

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com