Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:53:23 +0100 From: "Jack Raats" <jack@jarasoft.net> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the = system. At this moment I'm running: "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012" = without problems. Is it save to recompile the system with all patches? Thanks Jack Raats From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 10:03:00 2012 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87D2604 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F7A8FC16 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBRA2rGX082079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:02:53 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBRA2rGX082079 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBRA2rGX082079; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50DC1CC5.30402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:02:45 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Subject: Re: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1 References: <20121227104451.6fc6bfed@suse3> In-Reply-To: <20121227104451.6fc6bfed@suse3> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig31DD9BDE6FA63C15C7DD7385" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:03:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig31DD9BDE6FA63C15C7DD7385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote: > as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right?= /usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different. /usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system. /usr/sbin/pkg is a shim that can bootstrap the installation of /usr/local/sbin/pkg if it is not already installed, or that invokes /usr/local/sbin/pkg preserving the rest of the command line otherwise. > Is there a way to say "I have the pkg tool in base already"? pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either from ports or by using the /usr/sbin/pkg shim to install from a pkgng package. > Or is the pkg in base supposed to just install the pkgng from ports? Indirectly. /usr/sbin/pkg installs from a pre-compiled tarball, which is generated from the ports-mgmt/pkg port. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig31DD9BDE6FA63C15C7DD7385 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDcHMwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwhGACeJsw2ZAA0mpwjhGZpUOPOyd4F M3oAn1s3Ij5mXj2L87P39wTxP9QA8Snd =gW/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig31DD9BDE6FA63C15C7DD7385--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD>