From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 21 03:52:19 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA11592 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 03:52:19 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA11586 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 03:52:07 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA03117; Wed, 21 Jun 1995 03:49:48 -0700 Date: Wed, 21 Jun 1995 03:49:48 -0700 Message-Id: <199506211049.DAA03117@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: root@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de CC: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (root@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de) Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports/lang/gnat From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * If I think it's time to take up proper maintenance of gnat, * I'll send a notice to this list. That's great to hear. Thanks! Satoshi * PS: taking out gnat from the Makefile is a good idea. If * people know what gnat is and really want to have it, they * can compile it themselves. (also it takes up more than 5MB * when installed, which is pretty much if you never use it). Ok, I took it out for now, we can't have something that will break a simple "make" on an empty system in there. BTW, don't worry about people not knowing what they need, that's not the criteria we use to judge what to put in ports/subdir/Makefiles. :)