Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:03:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the
>> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first
>> I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will
>> gonna be the differentiator.
>
> The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me.  Do

is ZFS supposed to be faster at all?

really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918>