Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 11:19:12 +1000 (EST) From: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: moused conflicts with X11 Message-ID: <199606270119.LAA09419@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199606260659.IAA26099@ra.dkuug.dk> from "sos@FreeBSD.ORG" at Jun 26, 96 08:59:12 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>However I dont see that the Xserver should be changed, as they will >see /dev/mouse as a say mousesystems mouse, no matter what mouse >actually is on the system. That would also ease the X installation If it is done this way, how do you plan to deal with 2-button mice? Would 3-button emulation be included as an option, or would the X server still do that? How would the 2 buttons be mapped? What about a mouse that has more than three buttons (I don't know if the mousesytems protocol supports more than three or not). >for J. Randomuser. And besides I dont see the need for Yet Another >Mouse Interface (YAMI), when we can just use one of the de facto >standards. We also would have a BIG problem with commercial progs >that way, so lets not get that insane... I agree with this. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606270119.LAA09419>