From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 30 20:48:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF9D2C8579 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [IPv6:2001:470:0:19b::b869:801b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "xray.he.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CnXd6JzCz42qD for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from 99.100.19.101 ([99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com with ESMTPSA (ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:TLSv1.2:Kx=ECDH:Au=RSA:Enc=AESGCM(128):Mac=AEAD) (SMTP-AUTH username dpchrist@holgerdanske.com, mechanism PLAIN) for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:48:31 -0700 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Strange_bea=e2=94=82hio_in_daily_messsges?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20200430044801.GA22722@mithril.foucry.net> <2a178278-fd90-189e-edcd-dbe224ea94d5@holgerdanske.com> <20200430202808.GA39309@mithril.foucry.net> From: David Christensen Message-ID: <22b5ddff-b6df-3cac-0053-05abe3bf4c97@holgerdanske.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:48:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200430202808.GA39309@mithril.foucry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49CnXd6JzCz42qD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dpchrist@holgerdanske.com has no SPF policy when checking 2001:470:0:19b::b869:801b) smtp.mailfrom=dpchrist@holgerdanske.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.71)[ip: (-0.26), ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.64), asn: 6939(-3.59), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[holgerdanske.com]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:48:34 -0000 On 2020-04-30 13:28, Jacques Foucry wrote: > Le jeudi 30 avr. 2020 à 12:22:03 (-0700), David Christensen à écrit: >> On 2020-04-29 21:48, Jacques Foucry wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> Hop your going. >>> >>> I run a FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p4 on a baremetal server with many jail (one per >>> fonction). >>> >>> The mail jail use rspamd to fight against spam. >>> Like all of us I receveive everゆ mornin a security report from my jail (and >>> the host). >>> >>> In everey reports I found many rspamd errors: >>> >>> `(rspamd-2.5), jid 19, uid 236: exited on signal 10` >>> >>> Ok thats means rspand got a problem, but why I found tほose reports in *every* >>> daily security mail of *every* jail I use? >>> >>> How can I stop it? I did find (may be I look bad) anything in periodic >>> security script? >>> >>> What I miss? >>> >>> Thanks for you help and advices, >>> Take care. >> >> It appears signal 10 is a bus error: >> >> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/sys/signal.h > > Sad news :-( > >> This page clarifies the meaning of "bus error": >> >> https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/segmentation-fault-sigsegv-vs-bus-error-sigbus/ > > Thnaks for the pointer >> >> My guess would be the latter case -- unaligned memory access. This >> could be a coding bug (struct not laid out for 64-bit architecture?) or >> a misconfigured compile (?). >> >> >> Where did your rspamd binary come from -- package? port? downloaded >> and built by hand? > > Compile from my poudriere, no special configuration. I mean no `poudriere > options mail/rspamd`. > > > So should be ok with the hardware (poudriere and mail jail are running on the > same bare-metal server). > > Thanks for your help. Please "reply to list" rather than "reply to sender". I would file a bug report for rspamd. David