From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 22:10:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC09016A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01FE43D46 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0AMAVuC083135 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0AMAVtl083132; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:31 GMT Message-Id: <200501102210.j0AMAVtl083132@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Nick Hale" Subject: Re: kern/75601: ipfilter not allowing SSH to box on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Hale List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:10:32 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/75601; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Nick Hale" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/75601: ipfilter not allowing SSH to box on FreeBSD 5.3 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:06:44 -0600 Please close this PR. Rebuilding world/kernel with the libmap.conf in place seems to have repaired the issue at this time. The ruleset has not changed and yet it's now working properly. Regards, Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "Nick Hale" Cc: Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 05:10 Subject: Re: kern/75601: ipfilter not allowing SSH to box on FreeBSD 5.3 > On 2005-01-10 04:53, Nick Hale wrote: >> Lets add this in to the fray (this should help justify why I don't >> think it's a rules issue...) This does not happen on all of our >> boxes (most of which are 5.3 boxes, 2 4.10 boxes). The ruleset from >> box to box is IDENTICAL. > > Which I haven't seen, except for a pair of rules that use in/out in > the reverse direction of what I understood from the description. > > I could be wrong, but I'll just stop posting since I can't help you > with "ipfilter doesn't work". More details are needed, which you > apparently cannot or do now want to supply :-/ > > - Giorgos > >