Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:43:41 -0500
From:      eculp <eculp@encontacto.net>
To:        dg17@penx.com
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Opinion on using AMD Phenom II x6 1090t with Gigabyte 890BPA-UD3H and 8GB DDR-3 as a WebServer.
Message-ID:  <20110630094341.38064xcui4cdd2n4@econet.encontacto.net>
In-Reply-To: <1309355420.68251.8.camel@btw.pki2.com>
References:  <20110629073105.17922wqmo8yonl6o@econet.encontacto.net> <1309355420.68251.8.camel@btw.pki2.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Quoting Dennis Glatting <dg17@penx.com>:

> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 07:31 -0500, eculp wrote:
>> I just saw this box that is being promoted as a gaming machine at a
>> great price and am considering it as a web-server.
>>
>> In addition to having no information on the CPU as a server lack of
>> comfort with 6 cores and memory 8GB of memory that I am having a
>> problem with.  I am not a gamer but I have always assumed that a
>> gaming machine needs the most aggressive hardware.  I have also seen
>> this processor with 12 GB rather than 8 which, in my ignorance sounds
>> better.
>>
>> Any opinions and guidance are appreciated.
>>
>
> I have been moving away from Gigabyte however I do have a similar board:
>
> =09MB GIGABYTE GA-870A-UD3 RT

This one is GA-890BPA-UD3G that also has RealTek 811D 10/100/1000 Mbit =20
that I doubt will be a limitation.  I'll stick in another card anyway. =20
I also like that has is sata3 and usb 3 so it seems to be up to date.

>
> My key complaint about Gigabyte is the ReatTek Ethernet chips. Realtek
> doesn't publish chip specs and therefore the drivers under FreeBSD/Linux
> are so-so (i.e., they work but not performance optimized and forget
> about anything but the default MTU).
>
> On my board I hate the South Bridge chip, which is useless for RAID.
>
> I am also unable to install VMWare ESXi, my last ditch attempt to find a
> use for my board. There appears to be a hardware incompatibility while
> installing (i.e., not during the probe sequence, rather after that
> sequence then onto installation).
>
Thanks a lot for your suggestions and point of view.  I'm begining to =20
think that this may be too much machine but comming down doesn't save =20
much so I will probably give it a try.

ed
>
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110630094341.38064xcui4cdd2n4>