From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 23 19:43:30 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA13942 for current-outgoing; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 19:43:30 -0700 Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA13932 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 19:43:26 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA00882; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 19:43:03 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199509240243.TAA00882@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Any coincidence between bug report 688 and the SIG11 problem ? To: tommy@inlab.m.eunet.de (Thomas Obermair) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 19:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Thomas Obermair" at Sep 23, 95 06:51:45 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1839 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Hello, > > I have since I am trying to install FreeBSD on my pentium 90 machine > (asus P565TP4XE mainboard) some problems. The first time I was installing > directly from the 2.0.5 CD-ROM I have a problem that is at it's best > represented by the bug report 688 (Page fault: supervisor write, page not > present) in GNATS. When I try to run different kernels (*-SNAP, current > etc..) the problem seems to change for me to the obviously well known > SIG 11/10 problem. For me the two problems seem to be basically the > same but it could be that there are two errors though. > > OK, I would be glad hearing from you concerning the following questions: > > - Does anyone have found the same coincidence between the two errors ? > - Does the SIG 11 problem exist in 2.0.5 for faster machines ? > - Does anyone run an asus P55TP4XE motherboard succesfully with freebsd of > *any* kind at this time ? 100+ customers of mine are running some variant of FreeBSD on this board, it is not a board problem. Run -stable, it runs just fine on this board, if you still see sig 11's running -stable then you either have bad memory, bad cache or a bad MB. > - Does it make sense to run simply a (SIG 11 fixed) GENERIC kernel of > current leaving the entire 2.0.5 installation unchanged (for a > first time fix) ? > - Does anyone supply GERNERIC kernels of current for testing ? Where > could I find them ? > > Thank you all for your great work and patience, > Thanks for any reply, > Regards, > Thomas > > ___ > Thomas Obermair | Inlab Software GmbH > tommy@inlab.m.eunet.de | Josef-Wuerth-Str. 1 > Fax: +49 89 6411160 | 82031 Gruenwald / Germany > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD