Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:09:29 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. Message-ID: <9603301909.AA17247@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <199603291819.MAA24109@compound> <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On 30 Mar 1996 09:48:44 GMT, graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen) said: > Tony Kimball (alk@Think.COM) wrote: > : From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> > : Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 > : > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? > : Because the network address families they supported are no longer > : shipped, and thus they won't compile any more. > : Please, that isn't good enough to justify the cost. Stub them to > : return errors. > i would vote for this too There isn't anything to vote on; you're a month too late. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603301909.AA17247>