Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:00:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports subtree dependencies checking Message-ID: <20040519225920.V86578@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040518220007.GA35570@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040518152749.M52881@woozle.rinet.ru> <20040518220007.GA35570@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > as all of you knows, keeping up to date thw whole ports tree involves KK> > tremendous number of disk operation per cvs/cvsup. So, I use small script to KK> > keep up-to date rather small set of ports (less than 1000, comparing to 10k+ KK> > total ports in the tree). KK> > KK> > Sometimes this leads to broken dependencies (e.g., when tracked port becomes KK> > dependent on some new port, or when dependency port moves). The latter case KK> > partially can be covered by tracking MOVED file, the former can not. KK> > KK> > Previously, `make index' would complaint about missing dependencies, so these KK> > ports can be caught. Now, with INDEX_JOBS parallel index building, these errors KK> > are hidden in the process. KK> KK> They should not be. Please provide evidence. Hmm, I cannot easily reproduce this error right now. Hopefully I'll start our internal package building system to 4.10-R this weekend, and possibly catch a case. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040519225920.V86578>