From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 15:52:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF6416A41F for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from fep16.inet.fi (fep16.inet.fi [194.251.242.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D440343D4C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from mato.suutari.iki.fi ([80.222.160.17]) by fep16.inet.fi with ESMTP id <20050622155218.KQTS2488.fep16.inet.fi@mato.suutari.iki.fi> for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:18 +0300 Received: from [192.168.53.140] (orava.suutari.iki.fi [192.168.53.140]) by mato.suutari.iki.fi (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5MFqHpj061178 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.323 [267.7.10]); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:11 +0300 Message-ID: <42B9892B.7080608@suutari.iki.fi> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:11 +0300 From: Ari Suutari User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (mato.suutari.iki.fi [192.168.53.129]); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:17 +0300 (EEST) Subject: pf initialization during boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:52:20 -0000 Hi, I'm considering switching from ipfw to pf. However, I noticed a discussion about pf starting a little bit late during boot (the thread was in march, called "pf seems to start late?"). As far as I understood, interfaces were brought up before pf rules were loaded, causing the firewall to be temporarily fully open during boot process. Was this issue resolved later ? Ari S. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.10/25 - Release Date: 21.6.2005