Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:26:59 +0100
From:      Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        powerpc@freebsd.org, mips@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jeff@freebsd.org, ia64@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews
Message-ID:  <20130212002659.GA22851@alchemy.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <20130202214709.GA99418@alchemy.franken.de>
References:  <20130202163322.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130202214709.GA99418@alchemy.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:47:09PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio
> > work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for
> > the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID
> > controllers which drivers are changed by the patchset. Please do test
> > this before the patchset is committed into HEAD !
> > 
> > The plan is to commit the patch somewhere in two weeks from this moment.
> > The patch is required for the finalizing of the unmapped I/O work for UFS
> > I did in parallel, which I hope to finish shortly after the commit.
> > 
> > Patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/physbio.5.diff
> > 
> 
> First tests on sparc64 with ata(4), mpt(4) and sym(4) look good (to
> be sure I still need to test with a machine using a streaming buffer
> in addition to the IOMMU, though).

FYI, the latter case is also fine.

Marius




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130212002659.GA22851>