From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 15: 3:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F9F37B405 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 7463A14C2E; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 00:03:30 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Kirk McKusick Cc: Peter Wemm , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. References: <200110260006.f9Q05vQ05273@beastie.mckusick.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Oct 2001 00:03:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > FWIW, I add my vote to this option. There seems to be some confusion as to what I meant, so let me reword: I am in favor of switching time_t to 64-bit on *all* platforms in 5-CURRENT, and leaving 4-STABLE alone. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message