Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:00 +0000
From:      RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release
Message-ID:  <20071124160700.6b77838a@gumby.homeunix.com.>
In-Reply-To: <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.>
References:  <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +0000
RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:


> My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that
> use the tarball only do so because of networking problems, 

I think I slightly misunderstood that you're talking about the ports
tree on the install disk rather than an arbitrary tarball downloaded
from the website.

I still think its worth benchmarking it, but using the upgrade from
the 6.2 freeze to just after the official 6.2 release. 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071124160700.6b77838a>