From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 16:07:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C516A41B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1889113C4D9 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BD3D0503 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:07:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:00 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071124160700.6b77838a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:04 -0000 On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +0000 RW wrote: > My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that > use the tarball only do so because of networking problems, I think I slightly misunderstood that you're talking about the ports tree on the install disk rather than an arbitrary tarball downloaded from the website. I still think its worth benchmarking it, but using the upgrade from the 6.2 freeze to just after the official 6.2 release.