From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 11 16:05:49 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89F106566B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A148F8FC16;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BG5n8U042723;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BG5mCa042718;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:48 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
	bapt@freebsd.org using -f
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:05:45 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 -0000


--Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on=
 to
> >> > discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq
> >> >=20
> >> > regards,
> >> > Bapt
> >=20
> > Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff
>=20
> Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere?
>=20
> 	Cheers,
>=20
> 	Matthew
>=20
> --=20
> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
>                                                   Flat 3
> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
> JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW
>=20
>=20
>=20

No need except ports willing to have a custom PKGNAMEPREFIX but still wante=
d to
have a custom prefix anyway.

like=20
PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D	${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
PKGUNIQUEPREFIX=3D	py-

which is not mandatory but can help avoiding UNIQUENAME collision

regards,
Bapt

--Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/WF1kACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyylACgqsK6FkY3ks8s6wmtBQpt3Cqx
rEAAn12hTWnK+0PWioKOEUbFzyX/fP7O
=JdqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo--